What
Where
photosmarinavlad  

 

Didenko Family

© 2006-2021 Vlad Didenko

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

The content rights are not available for sale or licensing. Any use of the content except by the website owners is prohibited, unless specified per-page otherwise, or agreed in writing otherwise.

This website is for personal photos and posts, for the benefit of family and friends. As such it has a minimal needed set of features. No backward compatibility with old browsers is considered.

Most photos are processed to match a personal perception at the time of capture, and some photos are processed creatively. No guarantees presented about photos resemblibling a reality in any sense. No guarantees presented that a technology, or a personal advice, or/and any information posted on the website is usefull or harmless for your environment.

Pain Ray from Raytheon

The NPR story on the Raytheon device followed today the ongoing ACLU reporting and the specific coverage of the terrible invention.

Very, horribly, bad development. Patching the result, not the root cause of the problem - and deteriorating the society in process. The device’s safety is absolutely unclear. I am convinced that microwaving eye’s cornea to 2/3 of it’s depth is a bad thing. Witness accounts tell that is feels like scalding their skin. Would anyone consider scalding one’s eyes healthy? Other health concerns are posted in the same ACLU article .

But the worst effect is the moral one, mentioned by some commenters to the NPR story. Using the device is like a video game for prison staff - they are removed from the action. It is an ultimate humiliation and indignity for inmates, being tortured by a human “above them”. The device application is not improving inmates’ social outlook, it’s making them feel whipped animals and gives a moral “permit” to be anti-social to guards. All because bureaucrats mis-balanced prison occupancy and laws and now quick-fixing their mistakes at the expense of human lives.

Zimbardo’s study is directly applicable here with it’s effects and discoveries.

The other issue is that the NPR story is very unbalanced, showing lots of “pro” material and no elaboration on “cons” considerations. I hope NPR sticks to better reporting.

2010-09-10

 ∽   ⦾   ∽